New Look at the Middle to Lower Cretaceous Stratigraphy, Offshore Kuwait
Oil Company (KSC)
Bouman and Pete Jeans
Shell International Exploration and Production B.V.
exploration in Kuwait commenced in 1961 with the award of a 5,600 square kilometre
offshore concession to Shell. Some 6,300 kilometres of 3-fold analogue seismic
were acquired in 1961, and 3 wells were drilled during 1962 and 1963. In the
same period, Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) also drilled their first 3 offshore exploration
wells. In 1981, KOC embarked upon a second offshore exploration campaign, acquiring
some 6,000 kilometres of seismic data and, during 1983 and 1984, drilling two
wells. None of these wells was a commercial discovery.
1995 and 1997, an integrated team of KOC and Shell explorers undertook a review
of the hydrocarbon potential of Offshore Kuwait. In order to establish an integrated
sequence-stratigraphical framework for the prospective Lower to Middle Cretaceous
interval, a quantitative biostratigraphical study was made. Some 790 biostratigraphical
analyses (10% core samples; 90% cuttings) from eleven wells were carried out:
the nanno-fossil data was particularly important in providing accurate chronostratigraphical
calibration, and this data has been used to constrain a “Time- Rock Synopsis”.
lithostratigraphical nomenclature proved to be basically sound and has been
maintained as the basis for the present stratigraphical framework. However,
the study revealed the existence of two substantial and hitherto unsuspected
hiati: one between the Ratawi and Zubair formations of Early Valanginian to
Mid-Hauterivian age; and the other, representing the whole of the Early Albian,
within the Burgan Formation. This latter result, if it can be further substantiated
by more exhaustive study in the onshore area, would neccessitate a re-definition
of the Burgan Formation and the erection of a new formation to describe the
clastic sequence of Late Aptian age which lies between the Early Albian hiatus
and the top of the Shu’aiba Formation, and which has hitherto been included
within the Lower Burgan Formation.
27 September, 1995, a Joint-Study Agreement was signed between Shell International
Exploration and Production B.V. and Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) whereby an integrated
team of Shell and KOC geologists and geophysicists was established in The Hague
(The Netherlands) to undertake a review of the hydrocarbon potential of Offshore
Kuwait, including Kuwait Bay and Bubiyan Island (Figure 1).
results of the Study regarding plays and prospectivity of the Offshore area
are still deemed to be confidential by both parties and so will not be discussed
here. This paper, however, presents the results of one aspect of the work, on
the Cretaceous Stratigraphy of Offshore Kuwait, which has no confidentiality
implications and which, it is hoped, may be of interest to the wider community.
to the discussion of the details of the work, overviews of the history of exploration
of Offshore Kuwait, and of the tectono-stratigraphic evolution of Kuwait through
the Cretaceous, will be presented.
standard international sub-division of the Cretaceous comprises of an Upper
and Lower Cretaceous, with the boundary being at the top of the Albian. However,
in the Middle East a three-fold Cretaceous
has traditionally been used (Christian, 1997), with boundaries at the top of
the Aptian and at the top of the Turonian, respectively. This practice reflects,
far more usefully, the tectonostratigraphic evolution of the area, and is maintained
in this account.
OF PREVIOUS EXPLORATION
brief history of onshore exploration and an overview of the geology and oil
fields of onshore Kuwait is most recently provided by Carman (1996), whilst
detailed accounts of the Burgan and Raudhatain fields are presented by Brennan
(1990a, b). The first, and arguably still the best, discussion of the Tertiary
and Cretaceous stratigraphy of Kuwait was provided by Owen and Nasr (1958).
Yousif and Nouman (1997) provide the latest overview of the Jurassic stratigraphy
of Kuwait, whilst Khan (1989) reviews the Permo-Triassic stratigraphy. An excellent
list of additional references is provided by Carman (1996).
exploration in the Northern Gulf commenced in the mid-1950s in the Partitioned
Neutral Zone of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, and the first offshore oil field was
discovered in 1958 (Khafji: the northern continuation of Saudi Aramco’s Safaniya
field). Possibly prompted by this and by the IPAC consortium’s exploratory activity
in Iranian waters, offshore exploration in Kuwait commenced in 1961 with the
award of a 5,600 square kilometre (sq km) offshore concession to Shell, of which
the eastern part of the area was effectively ‘off-limits’ due to boundary disputes
between Kuwait, Iran, and Saudi Arabia.
1961 Shell shot 6,300 km of 3-fold analogue seismic, from which it became apparent
that the ‘open’ part of the concession comprised a gentle, north-easterly-dipping
monocline, and the only three
which could be identified were of very low relief, with mapped closures of less
than 35 metres (m). These were drilled between 1962 and 1963. The least discouraging
results were obtained from the first well drilled, which tested at an initial
rate of 720 barrels of oil per day (bopd) of 38°-40° API oil from Lower Cretaceous
Ratawi limestones. Unfortunately, production declined to only 103 bopd after
5 days. Only minor oil and gas shows were noted in the other two wells. All
three wells were abandoned. In the same 1962-63 period, KOC also drilled their
first offshore exploration wells, in the Bubiyan Island-Kuwait Bay area.
1981, the then-nationalised KOC embarked upon a second offshore and shallow-water
exploration campaign, acquiring some 6,000 km of seismic data. The new seismic
data was interpreted in the light of the results of the three Shell wells, and
a detailed review was made of the stratigraphy and hydrocarbon potential of
Offshore Kuwait (Al-Kandari, 1981). Between 1983 and 1984, KOC drilled two wells:
the first, a follow-up of the Shell non-commercial discovery, was a dry hole
with only shows of oil; the second recovered a maximum of 420 bopd on test from
the Minagish Formation.
OVERVIEW OF THE KUWAITI OFFSHORE AREA
shown by the geological cross-section and the seismic depth map (Figures 2 and
3), the structure in Offshore Kuwait is dominated by a gentle regional dip to
the north-east with no significant structuration intervening between the Burgan
Arch to the west, and the Khafji-Nowruz Arch to the east. Consequently, all
the offshore wells to date have been drilled on very low relief structures.
most prominent offshore feature is the north-northeast-trending Khafji-Nowruz
Arch, located in the extreme east of the Kuwaiti Offshore. The structure plunges
gently to the north-northeast; is asymmetric with a steeper western flank; and,
in common with the Burgan Arch, the upper part of the Middle Cretaceous sequence
appears to be truncated below the Base Upper Cretaceous Unconformity over the
structure. Structural growth is also apparent during Neogene times.
DURING THE CRETACEOUS: AN OVERVIEW
geological history and stratigraphic succession of Kuwait has been determined
by its location on the north-eastern margin of the Afro-Arabian Plate, and by
the motions and stresses (near and far-
to which that plate has been subject throughout its evolution. Hence this overview
will attempt to place the key elements of Kuwait’s Cretaceous history in a global
plate-tectonic context, as illustrated in Figures 4 and 5.
the beginning of Cretaceous times, Kuwait was located just north of the Equator,
and the large scale basin configuration had just changed from one of a differentiated
passive-margin of shallow shelves and deeper, intra-shelf basins which characterized
the Jurassic (Murris, 1980) to that of a very low relief passive-margin ramp
setting, with the stable Arabian shelf passing northeastwards into the deeper
water realm of the Mesopotamian-Northern Gulf Basin. Although the location of
the shelf-to-basin transition oscillated through time with successive eustatic
sea-level changes, the overall ramp architecture remained little changed in
Offshore Kuwait throughout the Cretaceous.
with its equatorial location throughout the Cretaceous, and the low-relief nature
of the Arabian margin, the Cretaceous succession in Offshore Kuwait is dominated
by carbonates, generally mud-supported (Figure 6). However, around 130 million
years before present (Ma), the opening of the South Atlantic, and then, some
25 Ma later, the opening of the Central Atlantic Ocean, induced a major change
in plate motion direction (Figure 4) with consequent impact, through far-field
stresses, on the Afro-Arabian Plate. Uplift of the cratonic hinterland of Arabia
resulted in the flooding of the passive margin with extensive tongues of deltaic,
shallow-marine sands, forming the Zubair and Burgan reservoirs, of Barremian-Early
Aptian and Mid-Late Albian age, respectively. Reduced clastic influx,
with rising sea-level, resulted in the re-establishment in Offshore Kuwait of
cyclic carbonateshale deposition through the balance of the Middle Cretaceous.
approximately 90 Ma, there occurred a pause in the steady northwards progress
of Kuwait, which reflects the onset of ophiolite obduction and nappe emplacement
at the leading edge of the Arabian Plate, the site of the present-day Zagros
Suture. In Kuwait, this deformation reactivated older structural features, and
generated the Base Upper Cretaceous Unconformity, which downcuts progressively
towards the west and south, causing significant thinning and loss of section
of the Middle Cretaceous over the major anticlines of coastal Kuwait. Growth,
though more subdued, of these major structures continued throughout the Upper
Cretaceous, which in Kuwait developed in a dominantly carbonate shelf setting,
whilst to the east, in the Mesopotamian-Northern Gulf Basin, a marl and shale-dominated
effectiveness of far-field stresses as a mechanism for generating tectono-stratigraphic
responses over large areas of craton is illustrated by a comparison between
Arabia and Central Africa. Guiraud and Maurin (1992) describe two phases of
intra-cratonic rifting from Central Africa which appear to be co-eval with the
Zubair and Burgan sand influxes of Arabia, and with the two-phase opening of
the Atlantic. In the reverse direction, the Santonian obduction event on the
Arabian margin is co-eval with the inversion of many of the Cretaceous rifts
in Central Africa (Guiraud and Maurin, 1992).
quiesence and shallow-water carbonate deposition characterized the Paleogene
of Kuwait. The onset, in Lower Miocene times, of the Zagros Orogeny, representing
the final collision of Arabia and Eurasia caused uplift and erosion in Kuwait,
represented by the Top Dammam Unconformity which shows truncation and gentle
arching over most of the major oil fields, whilst the succeeding development
and infill of the Zagros foredeep generated the regional north-easterly dip
which is such a feature of the Offshore area today (Figure 7).
OF THE LOWER-MIDDLE CRETACEOUS SEQUENCE
the low relief, monoclinal nature of much of Offshore Kuwait, it was felt that
stratigraphic trapping would provide the only possibility of significant hydrocarbon
entrapment within the Lower- Middle Cretaceous reservoirs (prolific producers
in the Onshore fields). In order to explore for stratigraphic traps, a high-resolution
sequence-stratigraphic framework is essential, building on quantitative biostratigraphical
data in order to provide as detailed a chronostratigraphical and paleoenvironmental
calibration of this sequence as possible.
500 samples were collected from eleven wells (highlighted in orange in Figure
1): most of these samples were split, and a total of some 790 biostratigraphic
analyses were made, by Robertson Research International Ltd. (foraminifera),
and Varol Research (nannoplankton). Approximately 90% of the samples analyzed
were cuttings. Previous analyses commissioned by KOC on ostracod distribution
were re-evaluated by Lacustrine Basin Research (LBR).
study is the first to utilize nannoplankton analysis on Kuwait samples, and
the data so obtained were crucial in providing accurate chronostratigraphical
calibration, far more than would have been obtained from the microfaunal data
alone. A zonation scheme specific to Offshore Kuwait has been developed (Figure
8). It utilizes a combination of global markers and local nanno-fossil events
which are consistently recognizable in the wells studied (Varol, 1996).
The quantitative biostratigraphic data was plotted on a well-by-well basis and
a well log and seismic correlation framework established (Figure 9). From this
it was apparent that the parallel reflection geometry seen on the seismic data
concealed no significant diachronicity in the investigated sequence, and that
KOC’s lithostratigraphical nomenclature was sound. Hence it was retained as
the basis for the Offshore stratigraphical framework. A new Time-Rock Synopsis
(Figure 10) was constructed. The parallel nature of the formation boundaries
reflects the lack of diachronicity and the parallel nature of the seismic reflections
across the area.
of the biostratigraphic and well-data revealed the presence of two major disconformities/
hiati, with no data representing the Late Valanginian-Early Hauterivian, or
Latest Aptian-Early Albian being recorded. It was also apparent that the age
and stratigraphic position of these gaps may have been incorrectly identified
in the past, namely:
that the regionally-identified Aptian-Albian disconformity does not occur at
the Burgan-Shu’aiba contact, but within the lower part of the Burgan Formation,
and that the basal shales of the Burgan Formation lie below this hiatus, and
are of Late Aptian age. The age control on the Lower Burgan sands is poor, and
the hiatus is assumed to lie just below the incoming of the massive Burgan Fourth
sands. The presence of a major hiatus at this time is attributed to the significant
change in plate motion that affected Arabia at ~110 Ma (Figure 4).
that the disconformity separating the Zubair and Ratawi formations is of Early
Valanginian-Early Hauterivian age, and not co-incident with the Hauterivian-Barremian
boundary as previously suggested. A hiatus of similar age is reported from southwest
Iran by Shakib (in Simmons, 1994), and corresponds to a major global eustatic
of the Lower Cretaceous Stratigraphy
Lower Cretaceous sequence of Kuwait ranges in thickness from 3,800 ft to 4,400
ft (Figure 11), becoming thicker to the north-northeast as the Mesopotamian
trough is approached. The sequence can be sub-divided into two cycles: Makhul,
Minagish and Ratawi Formations The sequence comprises a relatively featureless
succession of mud-supported limestones and interbedded shales.
Makhul Formation is composed of dense grey-dark grey limestones and interbedded
dark grey shales and averages 450 ft in thickness in the Offshore area. The
succeeding Minagish Formation ranges in thickness from 800 ft in the south of
the area to 1,200 ft in the north and comprises a sequence of grey argillaceous
lime mud-wackestones with interbedded green-grey calcareous shales. The oolitic
grainstones that characterize this formation in Onshore Kuwait have not been
encountered in the Offshore. The Ratawi Formation is divided into two members,
the Lower Ratawi Limestone and the Upper Ratawi Shale, reflecting the proportion
of lime mud-wackestone and calcareous shales and marls in each unit, which average
about 500 feet in thickness.
environment of deposition based on ostracod analysis is overall inner shelf
(i.e. low tide down to ~40 m) with a conjectural 20-50 m water-depth towards
the north (Lacustrine Basin Research, 1996).
age of the sequence is ?latest Tithonian to Early Valanginian (Varol Research,
Shu’aiba and “Unnamed Clastics”
High global sea-level prevailed during Late Hauterivian to Late Aptian but despite
this, uplift of the Arabo-Nubian craton resulted in the influx of the Zubair
delta from the west, inundating the entire
area with an interbedded sequence of sands (fine-very fine grained) and shales.
The sequence thins from ~1,350 ft to less than 1,000 ft, and the sand percentage
decreases, in a northeasterly direction, from 50% near the southern coast to
~20% in the vicinity of Bubiyan Island (Figure 11).
faunas indicate that the Zubair Formation was deposited on a broad, relatively
shallow continental shelf with average water depths between 20 and 40 metres
(Lacustrine Basin Research, 1996). Nannoplankton ages for the Zubair range from
Late Hauterivian to Early Aptian.
Shu’aiba Formation (Early-Late Aptian in age) marked a temporary return to shallow
marine carbonate deposition, and it comprises a light grey-buff, lime wackestone,
which is frequently fractured, locally vuggy (and hence a frequent lost circulation
zone) and averages 300 ft in thickness.
the close of Shu’aiba times, clastic sedimentation resumed through to the end
of the Aptian. This shale sequence is considered to conformably overlie the
Shuaiba (as observed by Owen and Nasr, 1958), and has hitherto been referred
to the lowermost part of the Burgan Formation. As a result of this study, however,
a major hiatus or disconformity has been identified seperating these shales
from the rest of the Burgan Formation, and hence it is felt that a new formation
name is required (the informal term ‘Unnamed Clastics Formation’ has been used
in Study Team reports). This interval ranges in thickness from ~80 ft in Burgan
field, to some 300 ft in the east of the Offshore (Figure 12), and was deposited
in an open marine inner neritic environment (Robertson Research, 1996). The
easternmost offshore well has been selected as the proposed type log for the
‘Unnamed Clastics’, which were encountered between 10,245 ft and 10,560 ft (depths
below derrick floor) (Figure 13).
of the Middle Cretaceous Stratigraphy
the Middle Cretaceous, global sea level rose to its highest level in Mesozoic-Cenozoic
history, reaching a maximum during the Cenomanian/Turonian. However, across
the entire Arabian passive margin, a renewed clastic influx occurred, spreading
clastics across large parts of the basin. Two sedimentation cycles can generally
be recognised during this period, both ranging from clastics at the base to
carbonates at the top. In Offshore Kuwait the lower cycle (Burgan and Mauddud
formations) is readily distinguished. However the upper cycle (Wara, Ahmadi,
Rumaila and Mishrif formations) in the offshore consists essentially of carbonates
and shales only. The isopach of the Middle Cretaceous sequence (Figure 14) increases
from 1,600 ft to 2,800 ft, though the ‘thin’ over the Burgan Arch is the result
of erosion below the base Upper Cretaceous unconformity.
and Mauddud Formations
the deposition of the Zubair and Shu’aiba formations and the (as yet unnamed)
basal shale of the Burgan Formation, the Middle Cretaceous commences with a
newly-recognised hiatus of approximately six (to possibly 11) million years
duration. (Due to age dating problems within the Burgan sandstones (only ditch
cuttings were used) no firm conclusions can yet be drawn regarding the precise
duration of this hiatus).
of the cratonic source areas to the west caused a renewed influx of sands over
large parts of the basin in the early Middle Albian. The Burgan Formation is
characterised by thick deltaic sands in the west, thinning somewhat to an average
thickness of 1,100 ft in the Offshore (including the basal shales). Towards
the east the sand percentage diminishes but not so dramatically as in the Zubair,
such that a net-to-gross of ~45% is still apparent in the easternmost well of
Offshore Kuwait (Figure 14). Carbonates onlapped in a westerly direction and
progressively displaced the clastics westward into interior Kuwait, resulting
in the deposition of the Upper Albian Mauddud carbonates. The Mauddud Formation
shows a gradual overall thickening towards the east and northeast, ranging from
the depositional featheredge in the Minagish area to some 425 ft in the Bubiyan
Ahmadi, Rumaila and Mishrif Formations
the deposition of the thick Albian Burgan-Mauddud sequence a number of relatively
shortduration carbonate-shale cycles comprise the balance of the Middle Cretaceous.
original depositional thickness of these intervals gradually increases towards
the northeast, but this pattern is highly modified by the syn-depositional thinning,
and end-Middle Cretaceous erosion, over the Burgan and Khafji-Nowruz Arches,
from which the Rumaila and the Mishrif formations have been completely removed.
lithologies in the offshore area are relatively uniform and are characterised
by alternations of (“highstand”) carbonates (i.e. mainly wackestones) and (“transgressive”)
shales. Water depths based on ostracods consistently range from ~20 m (shallow
inner shelf) to a possible maximum of ~70 m (middle shelf) during deposition
of the Ahmadi shale (Lacustrine Basin Research, 1996). CONCLUSIONS The principal
conclusions from this study are as follows:
There is no significant diachronicity apparent in the Lower and Middle Cretaceous
sequences across Offshore Kuwait. The layer-cake appearance of the Time-Rock
Synopsis mirrors the parallel nature of the seismic reflectors across the area.
• Nanno-fossils have the potential to provide a far more detailed sub-division
of the Cretaceous of Kuwait than has hitherto been available.
• A significant hiatus or disconformity is present across the Aptian-Albian
boundary, but it is thought to lie, not at the Shu’aiba-Burgan contact, but
within the Burgan at the contact of the basal shales (now thought to be of Late
Aptian age) with the base of the Burgan Main or Fourth sand (of ?Mid-Albian
• A second major hiatus or disconformity is thought to lie at the contact of
the Ratawi Shale (now thought to be no younger than Early Valanginian) with
the base of the Zubair Formation (of Late Hauterivian age).
majority of the samples studied were cuttings, and hence the above results should
be regarded as provisional or indicative until they can be substantiated by
more detailed examinations based on cores and sidewall samples. If the assignment
of the basal Burgan shales to the Late Aptian as indicated here can be substantiated
by more detailed work, then it is recommended that this sequence be elevated
to formation status and a formal name, preferably local, be assigned.
authors wish to thank Kuwait Oil Company and Shell International for permission
to publish the results of this study. The authors also wish to thank the anonymous
reviewers and Gulf PetroLink staff for redrafting some of the figures.
A. 1981. Kuwait Offshore Geology. Kuwait Oil Company, Internal Report.
P. 1990a. Raudhatain Field, Kuwait, Arabian Basin. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists Atlas of Oil and Gas Fields, Structural Traps, 1, p. 187-210.
P. 1990b. Greater Burgan Field, Kuwait, Arabian Basin. American Association
of Petroleum Geologists Atlas of Oil and Gas Fields, Structural Traps, 1, p.
G.J. 1996. Structural Elements of Onshore Kuwait. GeoArabia, v. 1, n. 2, p.
L. 1997. Cretaceous Subsurface Geology of the Middle East Region. GeoArabia,
v. 2, n. 3, p. 239- 256.
R. and J.C Maurin 1992. Early Cretaceous Rifts in West and Central Africa. Tectonophysics,
213, p. 153-168.
B.U., J. Hardenbol and P.R. Vail 1988. Mesozoic and Cainozoic Chronostratigraphy
and Cycles of Sea Level Change. In C.K. Wilgus et al. (Eds.), Sea Level Changes,
An Integrated Approach. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists
Special Publication no. 42, p. 71-108.
W.B., R.L. Armstrong, A.V. Cox, L.E. Craig, A.G. Smith and D.G. Smith 1990.
A Geological Timescale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
A. 1989. Stratigraphy and Hydrocarbon Potential of the Permo-Triassic Sequence
of Rocks in the State of Kuwait. Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries
Seminar on Hydrocarbon Potential of Deep Formations in Arab Countries, Abu Dhabi,
1989, p. 3-29.
Basin Research 1996. Environmental Interpretation of Ostracod Faunas from Wells
Onshore/ Offshore Kuwait. Kuwait Joint Study Team Internal Report.
R.J. 1980. Middle East Stratigraphic Evolution and Oil Habitat. American Association
Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 65, no. 5, p. 597-618.
R.M.S. and S.N. Nasr 1958. Stratigraphy of the Kuwait-Basra Area. In ‘Habitat
of Oil’ American Association Petroleum Geologist Memoir 1, p. 1252-1278.
Research International 1996. Mid and Lower Cretaceous, Coastal/Offshore Kuwait;
Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy and Palaeoenvironments of 7 wells. Kuwait
Joint Study Team Internal Report.
M.D. 1994 (Ed.) Micropalaeontology and Hydrocarbon Exploration in the Middle
East. Chapman and Hall, London.
Research 1996. Report on the Stratigraphical Implications of Nannoplankton Analyses
on Eleven Wells. KJST Internal Report.
S. and G. Nouman 1997. Jurassic Geology of Kuwait. GeoArabia, v. 2, n. 1, p.
presented at 3rd Middle East Geosciences Conference and Exhibition, GEO’98,
Bahrain, 20-22 April, 1998 Manuscript received 23 June 1998 Revised 27October
1998 Accepted 5 November 1998
Aziz Al-Fares graduated from Kuwait University with a BSc degree in Geology
in 1992, and in the same year he joined Kuwait Oil Company as a Wellsite
Geologist. In 1994 Abdul Aziz was assigned to work as a Geophysicist at
KOC, and from November 1995 to December 1996 he was a member of the KOC/
Shell Joint Study Team. He is currently working as a 3-D Seismic Interpreter.
Bouman gained a MSc in Stratigraphy from the University of Utrecht, and
joined Shell in 1982. Following assignments in Peru, London, and Cairo,
he returned to The Hague in 1995 and was Senior Stratigrapher in the Kuwait
Joint Study Team. Mark is currently Course Director for Geosciences at the
Shell Learning and Development Centre, Noordwijkerhoud, in The Netherlands.
His areas of expertise include sequence stratigraphy, basin analysis, and
stratigraphical computing. Abdul Aziz Al-Fares graduated from Kuwait University
with a BSc degree in Geology in 1992, and in the same year he joined Kuwait
Oil Company as a Wellsite Geologist. In 1994 Abdul Aziz was assigned to
work as a Geophysicist at KOC, and from November 1995 to December 1996 he
was a member of the KOC/ Shell Joint Study Team. He is currently working
as a 3-D Seismic Interpreter.
Jeans is currently a Regional Business Advisor with Shell EP International
Ventures’ New Business Development Group. Prior to this, he was Senior Geologist
and then Project Leader of the Kuwait Joint Study Team. Pete graduated with
a PhD in Geology from Birmingham University in 1973, and worked in Oman,
Jakarta, Houston, and Brunei before returning to The Hague in 1989. His
particular interest is prospect and play generation.